2019 MLHC MLHC 2019

Clinical Judgement Study using Question Answering from Electronic Health Records

Abstract

Clinical judgement studies are essential for recognising the causal relation of a medication with adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Traditionally, these studies are conducted via expert manual chart review. By contrast, we propose an end-to-end deep learning question answering model to automatically infer such causal relations. Our proposed model identifies the causal relation by answering a subset of Naranjo questionnaire Naranjo et al. (1981) from electronic health records. It employs multi-level attention layers along with local and global context while answering these questions. Our proposed model achieves a macro-weighted F-score of 0.4598 - 0.5142 across the selected questions and an overall F-score of 0.5011. We also did an ablation study to validate the importance of local and global context for the model.

🌉 Interdisciplinary Bridge — Deep Learning and Natural Language Processing
🧭 Keyword Pioneer — clinical judgement
🐣 Hot Topic Early Bird — electronic health record
🐝 Cross-Pollinator — Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science, Computer Vision, Data Science & Analytics, Deep Learning, Healthcare & Medicine, Interdisciplinary, Knowledge & Reasoning, Machine Learning, Mathematics & Optimization, Natural Language Processing, Reinforcement Learning, Robotics, Security & Privacy, Speech & Audio