HAMLET4Fairness: Enhancing Fairness in AI Pipelines Through Human-Centered AutoML and Argumentation

Abstract AI systems can perpetuate and amplify existing biases and discrimination, prompting academic efforts to develop mitigation techniques. Despite progress, real-world deployments often expose limitations in current methods and tools--- overlooking preprocessing, adopting poor evaluation protocols, and failing to integrate domain knowledge. These gaps hinder the effectiveness and reproducibility of fairness solutions. AutoML has emerged as a promising approach to optimize AI pipelines and provide an evaluation framework. However, challenges persist, especially around: intersectionality support, explainability, and stakeholder engagement, which are crucial for fairness and human-centric AI development. We introduce HAMLET4Fairness, integrating AutoML with human-centered approaches grounded in logic and argumentation. This enhances interactivity and transparency in AI pipeline optimization while supporting intersectional fairness. HAMLET4Fairness leverages multi-objective optimization and bounds the search space by user-defined constraints, adapting the CRISP-DM methodology for co-design and collaborative problem solving. We validate HAMLET4Fairness through the well-known case studies in the literature and provide insights into how preprocessing choices affect fairness.