2020
COLING
COLING 2020
Comparison between Voting Classifier and Deep Learning methods for Arabic Dialect Identification
Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, we present three methods developed for the NADI shared task on Arabic Dialect Identification for tweets. The first and the second method use respectively a machine learning model based on a Voting Classifier with words and character level features and a deep learning model at word level. The third method uses only character-level features. We explored different text representation such as Tf-idf (first model) and word embeddings (second model). The Voting Classifier was the most powerful prediction model, achieving the best macro-average F1 score of 18.8% and an accuracy of 36.54% on the official test. Our model ranked 9 on the challenge and in conclusion we propose some ideas to improve its results.
🌉
Interdisciplinary Bridge
— Deep Learning and Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing
🐝
Cross-Pollinator
— Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science, Computer Vision, Data Science & Analytics, Deep Learning, Healthcare & Medicine, Interdisciplinary, Knowledge & Reasoning, Machine Learning, Mathematics & Optimization, Natural Language Processing, Reinforcement Learning, Robotics, Security & Privacy, Speech & Audio
Authors
Topics
Machine Learning > Core Methods > Classification
Natural Language Processing > Applications > Text Classification
Machine Learning > Learning Types > Multi-Task Learning
Machine Learning > Core Methods > Ensemble Methods
Machine Learning > Learning Types > Classification
Deep Learning > Learning Types > Deep Learning